Disclosure Diaries Update #70

The incursions, which seemingly began in late November, have continued to occur in and around a variety of sensitive military facilities.

As the public has started to look up to the sky, a large number of reported sightings have poured in – many of which can probably be resolved prosaically. That being said, the original sightings that kicked this off cannot be easily waved away.

The Pentagon asserted that the drones are not Iranian/Chinese/Russian, and are not part of a domestic program. Rep. Jim Himes insinuated the NJ sightings are the result of teenagers with Walmart drones, which seems unlikely. The FBI simply admitted they have no idea.

Besides the flurry of sightings over New Jersey – which officials continue to stress pose "no threat to public safety" (despite being unable to identify where they come from, or who they operated by) – there have also been incursions at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Similar activity may have also occurred at Andrews AFB.

Donald Trump, who is privy to the daily Presidential briefings, claimed:

“The Government knows what these are…where it came from & where it went...I can’t imagine it’s the enemy…Something strange is going on. For some reason they don’t want to tell the people and they should.”

According to a new interview posted by Jesse Michels, George Bush Sr. was briefed on a "major UAP event" in the 1960s during his time as the CIA director.

According to a story originally covered by Der Spiegel:

"Drones have been sighted several times over a US military base (Ramstein), the arms company Rheinmetall and the chemical company BASF."

This means Germany joins the US and UK in having recently experienced unidentified aerial incursions at sensitive military and industrial locations. For more English coverage, see here.

• James Fox's "The Program" has just been released

• Following the UAP hearing on the 26th of July, Members of Congress have called for a select committee with subpoena authority, to “go about the task of collecting information from the Pentagon and elsewhere” on unidentified flying objects. There have been conflicting messages from various Members of Congress on whether this is likely to happen anytime soon.
  
  Note – a select subcommittee was formally requested on March 13th. Rep. Burlison reiterated a desire to establish such a committee on Nov 13 2024.
• Reps. Moskowitz, Luna, and Burchett have repeatedly stated their intent to hold field hearings to overcome stonewalling from the Pentagon and military establishment
  
  "I think we [Congress] should try to get into one of these places [housing UAP evidence]...and if they won't let us in I think we should have a field hearing right outside the building...and the military will have to explain why that is." – Rep. Moskowitz (D)
  
  It is currently unknown when exactly we might expect that to occur, however as of Jan 12 – Rep. Luna confirmed: "I feel confident that we have enough evidence to move forward with our first field hearing. @mattgaetz @JaredEMoskowitz @timburchett . We will be announcing details soon."
• Several journalists have indicated that first-hand witnesses of the alleged UAP legacy programs are in the process of providing testimony/evidence to the relevant authorities (e.g. the IC IG) and/or are on the verge of making public statements in the near future (Example 1, example 2, example 3, example 4)
• David Grusch has received additional clearances through DOPSR to discuss some of his (alleged) first-hand knowledge of Legacy programs. He has mentioned he may be covering more of this information in an upcoming Op-Ed