Disclosure Diaries Update #29

According to Christopher Sharp, David Grusch's Op-Ed is being delayed by the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review (DOPSR) process.

"That includes David Grusch, whose own upcoming op-ed regarding UAP has been delayed by the DOPSR. The office has not finished its review of the draft he submitted two months ago."

Sen. Gillibrand revealed to Askapol that, in her words:

"I’m very concerned about UAPs, particularly drone technology, aircraft technology that is constantly around our military sites. And it’s a form of ubiquitous surveillance that causes great concern for me. And we need to know, is it Russia, China, Iran or other?"

Mona Nemer, the Canadian government's top scientific advisor, says her office will release a public UFO report by early fall:

"I think our report is going to be quite fascinating on the historic front, so stay tuned"

A source claimed to Askapol that:

“Luna and Gaetz were briefed by some people [current military] that had a video of bodies".

A spokesman for Rep. Matt Gaetz indicated:

"We can confirm that we received a briefing with Rep. Luna. We have no comment on the contents of that briefing at this time.”

Speaking to Project Unity in a YouTube interview, Rep. Ogles speculated on the technological capabilities displayed by certain UAP incidents, and questioned what impact this may have on the global economy/energy sector.

“They seem to have some sort of propulsion technology that’s unknown to man as we understand it. What does that do to the energy sector?”

While Rep. Burchett once again confirmed that a Select Committee on UAP is likely out of reach for the foreseeable future, he did indicate that he broached the topic of another public hearing (separate from planned field hearings) to dig further into the UAP issue.

TB: “But yeah, I talked to the Speaker about [additional hearings on UAP] He made some notes about it, and he didn’t seem like there’d be any problem having a regular committee hearing like we did before.”

ML: “And you guys still want a field hearing?”

TB: “Yeah. We can do field hearings without anybody’s approval, apparently.”

ML: “Yeah?”

TB: “But the Select [UAP] Committee, I don’t think that’s — that’s staffing, that’s money, that’s hassle….”

During a State Legislature meeting, State Reps. Ben Waxman and Jordan Harris badger the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency director on the frequency & nature of UAP incidents that have been reported in and around nuclear power plants.

• According to Senator Gillibrand – a public hearing in line with AARO's latest report can be expected soon, saying –"I'll probably have another hearing aligned with that public report.”
• Dr. Kirkpatrick had claimed Volume One of AARO's historical review would be published by the end of 2023...so keep your eyes peeled for that. There has been no update on why it has been delayed, or when specifically we can expect to see it published. Steven Greenstreet has identified an update may be forthcoming by March 6th.

• Following the UAP hearing on the 26th of July, Members of Congress have called for a select committee with subpoena authority, to “go about the task of collecting information from the Pentagon and elsewhere” on unidentified flying objects. There have been conflicting messages from various Members of Congress on whether this is likely to happen anytime soon.
• Reps. Moskowitz, Luna, and Burchett have repeatedly stated their intent to hold field hearings to overcome stonewalling from the Pentagon and military establishment
  
  "I think we [Congress] should try to get into one of these places [housing UAP evidence]...and if they won't let us in I think we should have a field hearing right outside the building...and the military will have to explain why that is." – Rep. Moskowitz (D)
  
  It is currently unknown when exactly we might expect that to occur, however as of Jan 12 – Rep. Luna confirmed: "I feel confident that we have enough evidence to move forward with our first field hearing. @mattgaetz @JaredEMoskowitz @timburchett . We will be announcing details soon."
• Several journalists have indicated that first-hand witnesses of the alleged UAP legacy programs are in the process of providing testimony/evidence to the relevant authorities (e.g. the IC IG) and/or are on the verge of making public statements in the near future (Example 1, example 2, example 3, example 4)
• David Grusch has received additional clearances through DOPSR to discuss some of his (alleged) first-hand knowledge of Legacy programs. He has mentioned he may be covering more of this information in an upcoming Op-Ed
• Some commentators have speculated that the architects of the UAPDA (e.g. Sens. Schumer/Rounds et al) are working diligently behind the scenes to continue furthering serious legislative UAP transparency efforts